Author Topic: Eschenbachs herlige kvasiterminologi for kvasivitenskap  (Read 518 times)

Telehiv

  • Global moderator
  • Supermedlem
  • *****
  • Posts: 1 717
  • Qui vivra verra
    • View Profile
Willis Eschenbach satt og spekulerte på hvordan man tolker klimaalarmistspråket, og fant ut at han like godt kunne lage sitt eget dictionary i saken (advarsel: ikke le på dere brokk her):


TERM                                                    DEFINITION

an expected result of global warming â?? â??We predicted warming and got a heavy snowfall insteadâ?.
anthropogenic â?? see â??human fingerprintâ?.
anthropogenic change â?? â??Itâ??s warmer than usualâ?.
anthropogenic climate change â?? â??Weather we donâ??t likeâ?.
autocorrelation â?? â??Say what? We donâ??t have to deal with thatâ?.
Bonferroni correction â?? see â??autocorrelationâ?
carbon dioxide â?? â??The secret knob that controls the climateâ?.
cause â?? â??Greenhouse gasesâ?
climate â?? â??Itâ??s warmer than usualâ?.
climate change â?? â??What â??global warmingâ?? became after we repeatedly predicted warming and got heavy snowfalls insteadâ?.
climate feedback â?? see â??natural variabilityâ?.
confounding factors â?? â??Things that we choose to ignore.â?
coupled non-linear chaotic system â?? â? y = ax + b â??
effect â?? â??dangerous anthropogenic global warmingâ?
external forces â?? see â??other factorsâ?
human fingerprint â?? â??We canâ??t explain what caused it, so it must be from people acting badlyâ?.
hundred-year flood â?? â??Any flood recurring more than one news cycle apartâ?.
Industrial Revolution â?? â??The time of the climate Eden when the temperature was exactly rightâ?.
IPCC Conference of the Parties â?? â??A recurring party attended by only the wokest of the wokeâ?.
it is well known â?? â??I believe thisâ?.
itâ??s a boundary value problem â?? â??This depends on future boundaries we canâ??t predict but weâ??ll act like we can.â?
multiproxy study â?? â??We left out the proxies that donâ??t agree with our theoryâ?.
natural climate fluctuation â?? â??We donâ??t know why it goes up and downâ?.
natural variability â?? â??We have no idea what the cause wasâ?.
naturally occurring dynamics â?? â??Something happened that we canâ??t explainâ?.
other factors â?? â??Deus ex machinaâ?.
predicted sea level rise â?? â??Run for the hills! Weâ??ll all be drowned!â?
projections â?? â??Itâ??s a forecast but we donâ??t stand behind itâ?.
proxies show â?? â??One tree in Yamal had this to sayâ?.
regime change â?? â??Cause and effect just went 180° out of phase for no reasonâ?.
renewable energy â?? â??This solution requires extensive subsidiesâ?.
requires further study â?? â??Give us more taxpayer moneyâ?.
social cost of carbon â?? â??Our analyses will completely ignore the benefits of fossil fuels and the greening of the planetâ?.
the effect of various lag times â?? â??Things that donâ??t line up can be made to line upâ?.
weather â?? â??Itâ??s colder than usualâ?.
well within expectations â?? â??Itâ??s colder than usualâ?.

Finally, we have the IPCC Likelihood Scale:

Virtually certain â?? â??All my cool scientist friends agreeâ?.
Very likely â?? â??We really hope this is trueâ?.
Likely â?? â??Two climate models out of three agreeâ?.
About as likely as not â?? â??Nobody has a clueâ?.
Unlikely â?? â??This outcome offends usâ?.
Very unlikely â?? â??We really donâ??t want you going down that pathâ?.
Exceptionally unlikely â?? â??Stephen McIntyre said it first so it canâ??t possibly be true.â?

Best to all,

w.
« Last Edit: 17.03.2018, 19:12:16 by Telehiv »