Klima og kopping

Started by Ryddegutt, 22.01.2017, 19:59:46

Previous topic - Next topic

Ryddegutt

Her er en godt skrevet kronikk som Richard W. Rahn hadde på trykk for en uke siden i Washington Times:

QuoteCostly regulations and mandates to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions that will have little or no global effect on temperatures over the next century make no sense. There has been no agreement on what the optimal level of carbon dioxide is, or what the optimal Earth temperature should be. We do know that plants grow faster with more carbon dioxide and thus food becomes cheaper, and that most people (including the Hollywood climate activist crowd) prefer warmer places over colder ones.

If the "science was settled," hundreds of millions of dollars would no longer be spent on trying to understand the various factors that influence climate and trying to build better climate models. Two hundred years ago, many medical doctors thought you could improve a patient by bleeding him or her. Many needlessly died as a result — including perhaps George Washington. The economy is now being unnecessarily bled by the environmental "doctors" who fail to admit their own ignorance.

Hele kronikken her:

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/16/bias-ignorance-and-reality-in-climate-science/


Kilde: Curry