Miljøvoldtekt i Afrika -for Hamburg skal være "ren"

Started by ConTrari1, 20.10.2020, 20:50:54

Previous topic - Next topic

ConTrari1

Nå følger Hamburg opp trenden fra Drax-verket i England, det skal brennes trevirke, denne gang ikke fra USA, men fra Namibia. Heldigvis ser det ikke ut til at Greta Thunberg blir pålagt å frakte klimaredder-brenselet i en liten seilbåt. Men da må det slippes ut mye co2 underveis. Her har vi en flunkende ny form for kolonialisme,  denne gang i klimaets navn. Klimafrelse er en verre kolonimakt enn de fleste andre i historien. Og Namibia var en tysk koloni....

Because of the long transport distances and especially because of changes in land use in Namibia, this form of energy supply would not be climate-compatible. The German environmental group also claims "the main beneficiaries would be corporations in the global North, which would be able to sell machines and transport vehicles and supply themselves with raw materials."

"Namibia is itself in an energy crisis and is importing up to 60 percent dirty coal power from neighboring countries to cover its local energy needs. Instead of exporting biomass, Namibia should use it to produce electricity in its own country. Sustainable methods for bush clearance must be applied. Bushes are an important carbon sink. They must therefore only be harvested in a targeted manner, which cannot be guaranteed if very large quantities of wood are exported," says Bertchen Kohrs, Director of the organization Earthlife Namibia.

https://notrickszone.com/2020/10/20/environmental-rape-of-africa-hamburg-power-plants-aim-to-deforest-namibia-for-power-plant-fuel/
Du må være litt gal, ellers blir du gæærn.

ConTrari1

Det er en av de mest nedrige historiene i vår verden. Selvoppnevnte miljøvernere  kjemper for å holde fattige mennesker i u-land nede i  en permanent tilstand av sult og nød. Og hvorfor? Fordi de vil at alle skal drive "økologisk" og føle seg varme om hjertet. Det kan de rike tillate seg, de på sultegrensen har annet å tenke på. Dette er en ekstremt menneskefientlig holdning, som dessverre har stort  internasjonalt gjennomslag.

The New Field Foundation (NFF) was founded in 2002 with money from San Francisco based real estate developers Barbara and D. Thomson Sargent. It claims to support the efforts of rural women to overcome poverty, violence and injustice in their communities. But it opposes biotech crops and other modern agricultural technologies, and gives hefty sums to La Via Campesina and other activists in Africa.

Her om genmodifisert  mais i Afrika:

"I grow maize on a half hectare" (1.25 acres), South Africa's Elizabeth Ajele explained in the video. "The old plants would be destroyed by insects, but not the new biotech plants. With the profits I get from the new Bt maize, I can grow onions, spinach and tomatoes, and sell them for extra money to buy fertilizer. We were struggling to keep hunger out of our house. Now the future looks good. If someone came and said we should stop using the new maize, I would cry."

Countryman Richard Sithole shared her excitement. "Now I don't have to buy chemical pesticides. With the old maize, I got 100 bags from my 15 hectares. With Bt maize I get 1,000 bags. Now I have money to buy better food and send my children and grandchildren to school and even university."


https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/04/23/financiers-of-poverty-malnutrition-and-death-part-2/
Du må være litt gal, ellers blir du gæærn.

Telehiv

Tragedien med biobrennstoff føyer seg inn i rekken av de øvrige mislykkede "grønne" alternativene:
- dyrt, miljøskadelig, og utarmende for den tredje verden som ikke har midler til å posere som "klimafrelsere"


Telehiv


ConTrari1

Quote from: Telehiv on 21.10.2020, 10:31:38
Her er mer støtte til påstanden om (grønn) "rape of Africa":

https://climatechangedispatch.com/eco-rape-of-africa-hamburg-power-plants-to-use-namibia-bush-wood-for-fuel/

Og vi -via vårt bidrag til FN- er med på  å holde Afrika nede i en "agroøkologisk" tvangstrøye:

In this era of incredible modern agricultural and insect control technologies, when American farmers get 3-5 times more crop yields per acre than 50 years ago­­ – how is it possible that Africa remains perpetually on the brink of starvation? That Africa faces yet another locust plague of biblical pharaoh proportions? That Africans must rely on absurd "time-tested," almost totally ineffective locust control methods?

Incredibly, this looming catastrophe is due to policies and programs that have been officially adopted and deliberately implemented by the very UN agencies that are now crying loudest about the horrific situation.

For years now, the FAO, UN Development Programme and UN Environment Programme (UNEP) have been working in cahoots with some of the most radical environmentalist pressure groups on Earth to devise and impose "agroecology" – a perverse combination of socialism, pseudo-ecology and primitive, anti-technology agriculture. The program is financed and advanced by the UN, by European governments via their development agencies and funding of environmentalist NGOs – and even by US taxpayers, who provide 22% of UN funding and underwrite grants to and tax-exempt status for environmentalist groups.

Agroecology is above all political. It rejects virtually everything that has enabled modern agriculture to feed billions more people from less acreage. It rabidly opposes monoculture farming, hybrid seeds, synthetic/non-organic insecticides and fertilizers, biotechnology ... and even mechanized equipment like tractors!


https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/02/23/keeping-africa-on-the-brink-of-starvation/
Du må være litt gal, ellers blir du gæærn.