Author Topic: Feil emissivitet brukt i jordens "energibudsjett"  (Read 129 times)

PetterT

  • Supermedlem
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
  • Tenk sjæl!
    • View Profile
Feil emissivitet brukt i jordens "energibudsjett"
« on: 29.09.2020, 22:30:55 »
Jordens "eneribudsjett", aka Kiehl/Trenberth energibudsjettet adoptert av IPCC, hvor jorden er gjort flat og solen kald har mange feil, og nå er det påvist at også emisiviteten som er brukt i beregningene er feil:

Plenty Of Physics Flaws Accumulate Into A Huge GHE Hoax: The Dark Secret Behind Surface Emissivity
https://notrickszone.com/2020/09/27/plenty-of-physics-flaws-accumulate-into-a-huge-ghe-hoax-the-dark-secret-behind-surface-emissivity/

Kiehl/Trenberth fake science
All this may sound rather complicated and in the end there is still this sour taste of uncertainty. We know for sure however, that surface emissivity, especially with regard to water, is significantly lower than 1. With an emissivity of 0.94 a surface at 288°K emits 367W/m2, not 390. This alone shoves off 23W/m2 from the GHE at least and exposes the infamous “Kiehl, Trenberth diagram”, where they claim 390W/m2 of surface emission (396W/m2 in later editions), as fake science. That’s it!

GHE only 10°K
In other words, if there was no atmosphere, just the surface as it is (excluding any dynamic changes, ceteris paribus), the surface of Earth would take on the temperature of 278.7K. If we allow for N = 1.27, thus the little asymmetry between the curves, the temperature would drop straight by 0.7°K to 278°K . Without an atmosphere, Earth would be 10°K colder.
Or, alternatively spoken, the GHE is 10°K in size!
Det er tanken som teller :-)

ConTrari1

  • Supermedlem
  • *****
  • Posts: 1 045
    • View Profile
Re: Feil emissivitet brukt i jordens "energibudsjett"
« Reply #1 on: 30.09.2020, 09:48:41 »
Takk til PetterT som tar opp denne viktige artikkelen. Tillater meg å lime inn inn her  min kommentar om saken fra 28-09:

Overflate stråling -hva er korrekt?

NTZ har et vektig og langt innlegg fra Erich Schaffer, drivhuseffekten blir her grundig drøftet og særlig  beregningen av jordoverflatens tilbakestråling. Dette er tungt stoff, men sikkert fascinerende for dem som har innsikt nok til å gjøre seg opp en egen mening. Okular?

Magic is all about illusion, and so is “climate science”. Nothing about the GHE is as it seems and so far the “critical” side has failed to see through it. No longer!

https://notrickszone.com/2020/09/27/plenty-of-physics-flaws-accumulate-into-a-huge-ghe-hoax-the-dark-secret-behind-surface-emissivity/