God artikkel fra Ross McKitrick om klimamodeller

[ConTrari1]

der han særlig gir en klar og god fremstilling av det absurde ved RCP 8.5, scenariet som  "nesten ingen kjenner til,  men som alle har lest om konsekvensene av."

RCP8.5 was created as an outlier; an improbable worst-case scenario, not a likely business-as-usual forecast. Yet countless scientists and economists have been using it as one. You know how the game works: feed RCP8.5 into a climate model, observe the catastrophe, then call it the "likely" scenario if we don't cut emissions.

https://www.thegwpf.com/ross-mckitrick-the-flaw-in-relying-on-worst-case-scenario-climate-model/

Edit; og han slutter med et gullkorn:
If we want to avoid the RCP8.5 future scenario all we have to do is stop feeding it into climate models, because that's the only place it exists.

(fra link til Financial Post)

[translator]

Ross McKitric er absolutt verdt å høre på! Her et intervju av relativt nyere dato (november 2019)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-l3ZxUvwAs