This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: translator on 25.10.2014, 15:42:01
Hvor er innlegget til Aalstad?
Quotedet var en tankevekkende måte å sette ting i perspektiv på; holde dagens CO2-villfarelser opp mot historiske fakta om de virkelig (og naturlig skapte) store klimabevegelsene bare i historisk tid mens vi menneskene har trasket rundt her i Norden.
Da blir dagens stadig mer falsifiserte CO2-påfunn og tilhørende pinlige forsøk på å produsere en tidels varmegrad i en tvilsom modell en underlig greie
QuoteFrom our investigations, which are based on actual spectroscopic data and which consider all relevant feedback processes as well as the solar influence, we can conclude, that a CO2 climate sensitivity larger 1 ˚ C seems quite improbable, whereas a value of 0.5 - 0.7 ˚ C - depending on the considered solar anomaly - fits well with all observations of a changing solar constant, the cloud cover and global temperature. A climate sensitivity in agreement with the IPCC specifications (1.5 - 4.5 ˚ C) would only be possible, when any solar influence could completely be excluded, and only CO2 induced thermal cloud feedback would be assumed, then yielding a value of 1.7 ˚ C.