Messages

[Germanyâ??s â??Silent Catastropheâ? â?¦330,000 Households See Power Turned Off In One Year!]

Det er de fattigste som konsekvensene av den ubegrunnede AGW-redselen går ut over:

Germanyâ??s â??Silent Catastropheâ? â?¦330,000 Households See Power Turned Off In One Year!
- See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2017/03/03/germanys-silent-catastrophe-330000-households-see-power-turned-off-in-one-year/#sthash.Z3iQY7nb.dpuf

Om Spencer eller andre har noe med å bevise eller detektere AGW å gjøre, er det ikke du, Emeritus, som bestemmer.
Spencer har så absolutt noe å gjøre når det gjelder å detektere eller bevise AGW på en eller annen måte.

Artikkelen og de refererte rapportene tar for seg lange tidsperioder da klimaendringene må ha vært naturlige og bestemt av hvor effektiv solinnstrålingen til jordoverflaten har vært.
Disse prosessene er fortsatt aktive.
NÃ¥r det gjelder de siste tiÃ¥rene (lurespørsmÃ¥l?) sÃ¥ har ingen bevist noe AGW eller greid Ã¥ detektere empirisk (ref. dr. Roy W. Spencer, som jeg har vist til mange ganger).  Det er en hypotese som mange kloke og kunnskapsrike forskere har tilbakevist.  En tilbakevisning/motbevis er nok (ref. Einstein). 
At mange forskere tar forbehold kan forklares med en strategi som går ut på å "tute med ulvene" for fortsatt å få forskningsmidler.
AGW er historiens verste vitenskapelige feilaktige hypotese.

Har du lært debatteknikk av Trump, Emeritus?

Ny forskning:

New Paper Indicates There Is More Arctic Sea Ice Now Than For Nearly All Of The Last 10,000 Years
By Kenneth Richard on 2. March 2017

Solar Forcing Of Modern, Historic Arctic Sea Ice
Only Slightly Less Sea Ice Now Than Little Ice Age

In a new paper (Stein et al., 2017), scientists find that Arctic sea ice retreat and advance is modulated by variations in solar activity.
In addition, the sea ice cover during the last century has only slightly retreated from the extent reached during coldest centuries of the Little Ice Age (1600s to 1800s AD), which had the highest sea ice cover of the last 10,000 years and flirted with excursions into year-round sea ice.
The Medieval Warm Period sea ice record (~900 to 1200 AD) had the lowest coverage since the Roman era ~2,000 years ago.
Of note, the paper makes no reference to carbon dioxide or anthropogenic forcing as factors modulating Arctic sea ice.
- See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2017/03/02/new-paper-indicates-there-is-more-arctic-sea-ice-now-than-for-nearly-all-of-the-last-10000-years/#sthash.fNJPchZ1.dpuf

Takk for advarsel Emeritus, og takk for gode råd fra andre.
Slikt er for jævlig.

Jeg fÃ¥r av og til mail fra "meg selv", dvs noen har opprettet uriktig mailadresse i mitt navn, f eks pettert(at)gmail.osv.  Slikt sletter jeg, men det er vel lite Ã¥ gjøre med det.

Tilbud som er for gode til å være sanne, for eksempel sex med kåteGunda eller falske merkevarer, sletter jeg også.

En annen sak er at den kjente tullingen Carbomontanus (aka Kullberg) har begynt Ã¥ legge inn kommentarer pÃ¥ blogger i mitt navn (som er unikt i verden).  Ka f.. ska'n gjerra med det?

[20 New Scientific Papers Link Modern Climate Trends To Solar Forcing]

Notrickszone har samlet opp enda flere referanser som viser at solen bestemmer klima:

20 New Scientific Papers Link Modern Climate Trends To Solar Forcing
By Kenneth Richard on 20. February 2017

http://notrickszone.com/2017/02/20/20-new-scientific-papers-link-modern-climate-trends-to-solar-forcing/#sthash.5e9ggAzV.dpbs

A Robust Sun-Climate Connection
Increasingly Affirmed By Scientists

â??The emerging causal effects from SS [solar activity] to GT [global temperatures], especially for recent decades, are overwhelmingly provedâ?
                                                          â?? Huang et al., 2017

[Nature Unbound II: The Dansgaard- Oeschger Cycle]

En ny forklaring på raske klimaendringer er publisert hos Curry:

Nature Unbound II: The Dansgaard- Oeschger Cycle
Posted on February 17, 2017
by Javier

Dansgaard-Oeschger (D-O) events are the most dramatic and frequent abrupt climate change events in the geological record. They are usually explained as the result of an Atlantic Ocean salinity oscillation paced by internal variability. Available evidence however supports that they are the result of an externally paced oceanic-sea ice interaction in the Norwegian Sea. A lunisolar tidal cycle provides an unsupported hypothesis that explains all of the known evidence for the 1470-year pacing and the triggering mechanism for D-O oscillations.
https://judithcurry.com/2017/02/17/nature-unbound-ii-the-dansgaard-oeschger-cycle/

Conclusions
1) Between 90 and 12 thousand years ago, Greenland proxy temperature records show more than 20 abrupt and intense climatic changes, known as Dansgaard-Oeschger events, paced according to a 1470-year periodicity.
2) Each D-O oscillation is preceded by North Atlantic cooling and iceberg discharges that, when intense and prolonged, constitute a Heinrich event.
3) D-O oscillations present an asymmetric change in temperatures with warming of 8-10°C in a few decades followed by a cooling in stages lasting from a few centuries to over a millennium.
4) Prior to abrupt warming in Greenland, temperatures rise in Antarctica until about 220 years after the start of Greenland warming.
5) The abrupt northern hemisphere warming increases global methane concentrations from boreal wetlands due to increased temperature and precipitations.
6) CO2 has no role during D-O cycle, and its levels are neither cause nor consequence of the most frequent and most abrupt climate changes of the past. The increase in CO2 levels during Heinrich events does not significantly alter the rate or magnitude of the warming during the subsequent D-O oscillation.
7) D-O oscillations require sea levels between 45 and 90 m below present, and appear to be inhibited by maximal obliquity.
The leading theory, the â??salt oscillator hypothesis,â? does not explain the periodicity and relies on unproven melt water pulses and a shut down of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current unsupported by evidence.
9) Rival D-O theory proposes the stratification of warm subsurface waters below the halocline and the sea ice in the North Atlantic and Norwegian sea, with the abrupt warming taking place due to the collapse of this stratification and the melting of the overlying ice.
10) A lunisolar tidal cycle provides an unsupported hypothesis that explains all of the known evidence for the 1470-year pacing and the triggering mechanism for D-O oscillations.

[Visualizing Government Arctic Sea Ice Fraud]

Miljøbevisste Tony Heller avslører hvordan de klimareligiøse misbruker informasjon om sjøis i Arktis for å villede politikere og andre godtroende "redde-verden-misjonærer".

Visualizing Government Arctic Sea Ice Fraud
https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/visualizing-government-arctic-sea-ice-fraud/

Det dukker stadig opp forskningsresultater som viser at klimaet bestemmes av solens påvirkning på forskjellig vis:

3 Recent Studies Indisputably Show Solar Activity Is Very Powerful Climate Driver!
By P Gosselin on 11. February 2017

- See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2017/02/11/3-recent-studies-indisputably-show-solar-activity-is-very-powerful-climate-driver/#sthash.aL4qlknP.dpbs

Og her er enda mer om justeringer som kun går en vei, dvs forsøker å vise at det har vært sterkere global oppvarming enn målinger ville vist uten disse justeringene av temperaturseriene (målesteder og mangelfulle justeringer av UHI).
Med slike justeringer vil temperaturkurvene tilsynelatende vise korrelasjon med CO2 utslipp, mens man kan avvise korrelasjon med solen, spesielt TSI.  Aktivist-"forskerne" med religiøs tilnærming til klimahysteriet er ikke troverdige.

More Data Manipulation By NOAA, NASA, HadCRUTâ?¦Cooling The Past, Warming the Present
By Kenneth Richard on 13. February 2017

Global Temperature Data Manipulation
 Thousands Of Non-Urban Thermometers Removed 
0.3°C Of Pause-Busting Warmth Added Since 1998
0.5°C Of Warming Removed From 1880-1950 Trend
- See more at: http://notrickszone.com/#sthash.kAXVlu4D.dpuf

[Klima er blitt religion]

NÃ¥ er det ikke tvil lenger.  Klima er en substituttreligion for ellers troløse fanatikere som leter etter noe Ã¥ tro pÃ¥.

Klima er blitt religion
Innrømmet av tidligere leder for FNs Klimapanel IPCC inderen dr. Pachauri i sitt avskjedsbrev (han måtte forlate IPCC pga kvinnetrakassering): «�my religion and dharma», ref.
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ar5/150224_Patchy_letter.pdf 

Flere som innrømmer at klima er religion:
Former Obama EPA Chief concedes: â??Climate change has become a religionâ?? (Gina McCharty)
http://www.climatedepot.com/2017/02/09/former-obama-epa-chief-concedes-climate-change-has-become-a-religion/
Artikkelen inneholder mange eksempler på at klima er religion for mange.

Mot religion nytter ikke realistiske argumenter.

En svært så aktiv nettmobber på dette forum som stadig trakasserer med begrep som "klimakuk" og "kullkuk" har så vidt jeg har registrert uttrykt noe om at havstigning kan brukes som temperaturproxy.
Ideen er sÃ¥ latterlig at jeg har lagt dette innlegget under skrÃ¥blikk. 
Det ser nå ut som om seriøs forskning har avvist en slik ide temmelig grundig, noe Notrickzone (som også blir mobbet av samme ufordragelige debattant) har publisert:

35 Scientific Papers: Global Sea Levels Were 1 â?? 2 Meters Higher Than Now For Most Of The Last 7,000 Years
By Kenneth Richard on 6. February 2017
CO2 Concentration Changes Do Not Drive Sea Levels
http://notrickszone.com/2017/02/06/35-scientific-papers-global-sea-levels-were-1-2-meters-higher-than-now-for-most-of-the-last-7000-years/#sthash.FWF8ONT2.dpbs
......
And casting even more doubt on the assertion that variations in CO2 drive sea level rise is the fact that there is robust paleoclimate evidence to suggest that todayâ??s mean sea levels as well as todayâ??s sea level rise rates are both relatively low (from a historical standpoint) and also well within the range of natural variability.  Nothing unusual is happening to sea levels today.  For even though we have evidence that modern CO2 concentrations (~405 ppm) are historically high relative to the last 10,000 years, we also possess a growing body of evidence that modern sea levels are still about 1 to 2 meters lower than they have been for most of the last 7,000 years.

The fundamental problem for the CO2-rise-causes-sea-level-rise paradigm, then, is that rising CO2 concentrations have not been correlated with rising sea levels for nearly all of the last 12,000 years.  In fact, the opposite has been observed during the last 2,000 years, or during the Late Holocene: CO2 levels have risen (gradually, then rapidly) while sea levels have fallen overall, with recent changes so modest (inches per century) that they do not override the overall trend).   In the 8,000 years before that, sea levels rose rapidly while CO2 concentrations remained flat.  Simply put, the supposed anthropogenic â??signalâ? in sea level rise trends has largely gone undetected â?? a point that has been affirmed by more and more scientists.

Tom V. Segalstad er en internasjonalt anerkjent spesialist på CO2 og skriver på sin blog:
http://www.co2web.info/ 

The stable 13C/12C carbon isotopes in the air's CO2 give us the only way to determine its anthropogenic fraction: ~4%. This fraction would account for less than 0.5 W/m2, less than 0.1% of the Greenhouse Effect, or ~0.1°C. Clouds have far more temperature regulating power than atmospheric CO2. ~96% of the air CO2 comes from non-fossil-fuel sources, i.e. natural marine and volcanic degassing.

Isotopic mass balance finds an air CO2 lifetime (halflife) ~5 years, like many other studies with other methods. ~18% of air CO2 is exchanged annually in nature, almost 20 times more than added anthropogenically. The ocean's upper 200 m has enough calcium to bind ALL remaining fossil fuel CO2 as calcium carbonate, which will not dissolve in the ocean. Henry's Law dictates that anthropogenic doubling of the global air CO2 is impossible. The ocean pH varies considerably in surface water due to temperature. The pH buffers in the ocean constitute an almost infinite buffer capacity, hence the assertion on anthropogenic acidification of the ocean, and dissolution of lime there, is not realistic.

Et meget godt og viktig innlegg Ryddegutt.   

Her er en annen som har vært inne på det samme:
Bartemis: on mass balance and the cause of changing levels of atmospheric CO2
https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/10/26/bartemis-on-mass-balance-and-the-cause-of-changing-levels-of-atmospheric-co2/

FNs klimapanel har ignorert en mengde forskning som ikke stemmer med klimaalarmismen AGW:
Av nesten 40 forskningsrapporter som viser CO2 oppholdstid i atmosfæren på ca 5-10 år så har IPCC valg 1 rapport som viser 100 år.
IPCC har ignorert forskningen til E-G. Beck som viser nesten like mye CO2 i luften i 1940-årene som nå.
I diskusjonen "IPCCs påfallende konflikt med solforskningen " viser Telehiv at IPCC har ignorert det meste av solforskning.