Vis innlegg

Denne delen lar deg se alle innlegg laget av dette medlemmet. Merk at du bare kan se innlegg gjort i områder du har tilgang til.


Emner - PetterT

Sider: [1] 2
1
Aktører og hendelser / Komiske ALIas Emeritus
« på: 03.07.2018, 21:11:15 »
Komiske ALIas Emiritus må være en av de mest hyklerske personer jeg har opplevd.
Han ser ikke bjelken i sitt eget øye, men påpeker flisen i andres.  Forsøker å mobbe Joanne Nova med utsagnet "klimaslufsa" for å samle inn litt penger å drive opplysningsvirksomhet for, mens klimahysterikerne har sugerør i statskassene i mange klimareligiøse land. Emeritus-tosken mener det i tillegg er umoralsk å be om litt støtte, men overser "fakegate" og "climategate 1 & 2". Se:

BINBS Professor Slams The ‘Ethically Questionable Persuasion Tactics’ Of The ‘Believers’ Who Market AGW
http://notrickszone.com/2018/07/02/oslo-professor-the-deceptive-tactics-used-by-agw-believers-mark-an-epic-marketing-failure/
In a new paper published in the Journal of Social Marketing, Dr. Erik L. Olson spotlights the “Fakegate” scandal as a salient example of the unethical and deceptive practices used by those who promote dangerous anthropogenic global warming (AGW) — a“difficult-to-sell” cause. It is suggested that the ethically questionable tactics employed by AGW “marketers” (i.e., falsely hyping “the severity, immediacy and certainty of AGW threats”) have failed and should be resisted.

Han var så dum at han røpet sin egen identitet i et innlegg, men likevel ville han ha innlegget slettet.
Man blir jo litt nysgjerrig på en slik kverulantisk mobber (som på Carbomontanus aka Kullberg) så jeg googlet vedkommende og det jeg fant var ikke særlig flatterende.  Fyren burde skjemmes, men har åpenbart ikke skamvett.  Det er ett av kriteriene for å være psykopat. Selv er jeg blitt fjerndiagnostisert av Emeritus for å ha tourettes og blitt truet med å bli spist.  Nå mener han at jeg er en idiot som har betalt $2500 for å bli "Platinum Member" i JoNovas fond. 
Akk ja, - mot dumheten kjemper gudene forgjeves.

2
Viktige klimatema / El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
« på: 11.04.2018, 11:47:11 »
Skyldes El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) geotermiske variasjoner?

Are El Ninos Fueled By Deep-Sea Geological Heat Flow?
https://nextgrandminimum.com/2018/04/10/proof-el-ninos-are-fueled-by-deep-sea-geological-heat-flow/

This paper offers aka similar view:
Eight Charts Which Prove That Chandler's Wobble Causes Earthquakes, Volcanism, El Nino, and Global Warming
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/vortectonics/vortex_correlations2.htm

3
Media og politikk / Klimapolitikk
« på: 14.02.2018, 14:36:04 »
Regjeringen har lagt frem en ny spekulasjonsrapport, som blir servilt etterapet i media, her i TU:

Klimaendringer og norske bedrifter
Rapport: Slik påvirkes Norge av klimaendringer som rammer andre land
– Næringslivet må forberede seg.
https://www.tu.no/artikler/rapport-slik-pavirkes-norge-av-klimaendringer-som-rammer-andre-land/430333

Rapporten er ren spekulasjon.
Det er ingen observasjoner eller målinger som fra fortid eller nåtid som underbygger spådommene om fremtiden i rapporten.
Tvert imot så har den milde oppvarmingen (ca 0,8 grader C) vi har hatt av naturlige årsaker, hovedsakelig variasjon i solpåvirkning, siden Lille Istid sluttet på 1800-tallet bare vært gunstig for klima og matproduksjon over størstedelen av verden. For eksempel så har Sahara skrumpet inn og Sahel-området fått mer plantevekst og blitt mer fruktbart.
Solens oppvarming av havet pluss økt biologisk aktivitet pga litt høyere temperatur har ført til en gunstig øking av O2-kilden og plantenæringen CO2, sjekk Henry's lov.
Det er ikke mer ekstremvær eller øking i naturkatastrofer, ref. professor Roger Pielke.
FN WHO meldder om økt matproduksjon som holder tritt med befolkningsveksten i takt med økt temperatur og CO2.
Globale forsikringsselskaper (eks. Zurich) melder om lavere utbetalinger i forhold til brutto nasjonalprodukt.
Ettersom solen er den faktor som påvirker global temperatur og klima mest, og fremtidig solaktivitet forventes å bli redusert, så er det mange solforskere som forventer lavere temperaturer i nær fremtid. Da er det mest sannsynlig at konsekvensene blir de motsatte av spekulasjonsrapporten til regjeringen.

4
Energi og miljø / Energipolitikk
« på: 13.02.2018, 20:53:27 »
En svært god og tankevekkende artikkel:

Skal norsk kraftforsyning styres av historieløse aktivister, politikere og byråkrater?
av Steinar Jakobsen, 13. februar 2018
https://resett.no/2018/02/13/skal-norsk-kraftforsyning-styres-av-historielose-aktivister-politikere-og-byrakrater/

"Billig vannkraft har til nå vært en velsignelse for det norske folk, både for private og for næringslivet. Dette planlegger politikere, byråkrater, aktivister og det klimaindustrielle komplekset å gjøre en slutt på. De forskjellige aktørene argumenterer for å koble det norske kraftnettet til EU og Storbritannia i stadig økende grad, samt overlate koordineringen av dette til et EU-organ. Det betyr at Norge risikerer å miste råderetten over vannkraften – arvesølvet – som fremsynte politikere i tidligere tider kjempet for at vi skulle beholde innenlands."

MÅ LESES

5
Energi og miljø / El-biler slipper ut mest CO2
« på: 14.12.2017, 21:29:17 »
Vi som mener litt mer CO2 er bare bra for livet på jorden bør flytte til Kina og kjøre el-bil  ;D
Driving Electric Vehicles In China Increases CO2 Emissions…Driving Gasoline Vehicles In China Reduces CO2 Emissions
http://notrickszone.com/2017/12/11/driving-electric-vehicles-in-china-increases-co2-emissions-driving-gasoline-vehicles-in-china-reduces-co2-emissions/#sthash.VQzGo5TI.dpbs
According to recently published scientific papers, driving an EV in China dramatically increases CO2 emissions relative to driving an internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV).
Why?  Because China’s electricity grid is overwhelmingly powered by fossil-fuels (i.e., 88% of China’s energy consumption  (2015) is derived from coal, oil and gas).   Therefore, the energy used to charge up an electric vehicle in China is derived from a rapidly growing fossil fuel-based electrical grid.

6
Energi og miljø / Biofuel-bløffen
« på: 08.12.2017, 09:41:53 »
Selv IPCC tviler nå på om biofuel har noe for seg:
It's final - corn ethanol is of no use
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2014/04/20/its-final-corn-ethanol-is-of-no-use/#5bd85c3867d3

7
En klok danske skal visstnok ha sagt at "det er vanskelig å spå, - især om  fremtiden".  Om det er Kumbel, Piet Hein eller Storm P vet/husker jeg ikke, men nok om det. 
Innen klimatemaet har det vært mange katastrofespådommer.  Noen har ikke slått til, og noen er stadig blitt utsatt slik Jehovas Vitner stadig utsetter Dommedag.  Vi gamle husker at konsensus på tidlig 1970-tall var global avkjøling og mulig ny istid.  Noen av datidens spå/trollmenn har kastet seg på klimahysteriet ettersom istiden uteble.

Her er noen feilaktige spådommer:
Some Failed Climate Predictions
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/10/30/some-failed-climate-predictions/

Motsatt av global oppvarming så er det mange tegn på at det i stedet kan bli kaldere tider:
7 Major Signs The Globe’s Surface Has Been Cooling, And Will Continue To Cool
http://notrickszone.com/2017/12/03/7-major-signs-the-globes-surface-has-been-cooling-and-will-continue-to-cool/#sthash.P6kFvLin.dpbs

Basert på at vi går inn i en tid med lav solaktivitet så holder jeg en knapp på avkjøling, men den er tidsforsinket i forhold til solen pga treghet i hovedsaklig avkjøling av havet. 
Nature Unbound VI – Centennial to millennial solar cycles
https://judithcurry.com/2017/12/02/nature-unbound-vi-centennial-to-millennial-solar-cycles/
Conclusion 5
5) In all cases a decadal or longer decrease in solar activity is associated with a decrease in temperatures and a change in precipitation patterns. A 10-year delay between solar changes and climatic changes is observed in some studies.

Den som lever får se.

8
Viktige klimatema / Correlation is not causation
« på: 19.09.2017, 10:50:14 »
Det gjentas til det ulidelig kjedsommelige at det er god relasjon mellom CO2 og global temperatur.
Mest kjent er Al Gore i filmen "An unconvenient truth" hvor han viste hvordan CO2 og temperatur følger hverandre i 400 000 år basert på iskjerneprøver fra Vostok i Antarktis.  Den inconvenient truth Gore utelot er at først endres temperatur og deretter CO2 i samsvar med den temperaturavhengige absorpsjonskoeffisienten i naturloven om absorpsjon av gass i væske (Henrys lov). 
Men det er jo blitt en "sannhet" at "når en løgn gjentas mange nok ganger så blir det en sannhet".

Nå er en ny korrelasjon oppdaget:
New Paper(s): Seismic Activity Flux Explains 1979-2016 Temperatures, ENSO Events Better Than CO2
http://notrickszone.com/2017/09/18/new-papers-seismic-activity-flux-explains-1979-2016-temperatures-enso-events-better-than-co2/#sthash.k1SdfYHC.dpbs
Could Earth’s Shifting Plates Be Driving Modern Climate?

Forfatter rapporterer:
Within the last year, Dr. Arthur Viterito (geography professor) has published multiple scientific papers documenting the significant correlation (r=0.80) between the seismic activity changes in the Earth’s high geothermal flux areas (HGFA) and both El Niño events and global temperatures.
The HGFA/global temperature correlation has been found to be stronger than the correlation for CO2 concentration changes (r=0.74) for recent decades (1979-2016).

Selv denne professor opererer med korrelasjon mellom CO2 og temperatur, men har visst glemt at CO2 FØLGER temperatur, og kan derfor ikke være ÅRSAK til temperaturendringer.
Ekstrem-alarmister vil muligens hevde at CO2 forårsaker jordskjelv  ::)  :o  ;D 

Regner med at Emeritus Montanus kommenterer at nå har vimsen PetterT funnet enda en tullete teori å tro på.  8)


9
Viktige klimatema / Adiabatisk temperaturendring
« på: 10.08.2017, 23:42:14 »
Teorien om adiabatisk (trykkpåvirket) temperaturendring er nå kommet inn i lærebok:
http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1119117372.html

Environmental Aspects of Oil and Gas Production
John O. Robertson, George V. Chilingar

The “adiabatic theory” of the greenhouse effect (adiabatic: “the constant decline in temperature of an air parcel as it rises in the atmosphere due to pressure drop and gas expansion”) is capable of explaining the variances in temperatures on planets like Earth, Mars, and Venus using each planet’s atmospheric pressure gradient – and without reliance on the traditional greenhouse effect theory that assigns a governing role to CO2.
http://notrickszone.com/2017/08/10/new-engineering-textbook-asserts-the-impact-of-co2-emissions-on-climate-is-negligible/#sthash.74vDngBT.YLPsvKOo.dpbs

En klok (!) emeritus matematikk-prof. Claes Johnson om den adiabatiske effekt:
A new study by Nikolov and Zeller supports the idea presented by several climate skeptics including myself that global temperature is the result of a thermodynamic gravito-thermal effect setting a lapse rate (decrease of temperature with altitude) of about 6.5 C/km and an effect of radiation to outer space occuring from an altitude of about 5 km (on rough average). The study reported at length on WND is published in Environment Pollution and Climate Change:
New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model.
The study shows that the basic postulate of CO2 alarmism of a "greenhouse effect" from radiation alone without the gravito-thermal effect, gives CO2 a much inflated role as control knob for global temperature: Warming of 3 C upon doubling of CO2 as a 10 fold inflation of a possible real effect of at most 0.3 C, so small that it cannnot be observed and distinguished from natural variations and thus practically zero.
http://claesjohnson.blogspot.no/2017/07/inflated-greenhouse-effect.html






10
Media og politikk / Verdens undergang gang på gang
« på: 03.08.2017, 23:33:33 »
Malthus' etterplaprere har florert opp gjennom historien, men AGW tar kaka.
Et avslørende og tankevekkende essay :

MASS DEATH DIES HARD

Clive James: ‘Climate Alarmists Were Bound To Run Out Of Credibility’
Date: 31/07/17

Global Warming Policy Foundation
The legendary author, poet, journalist and humorist, Clive James has recently been casting a weary eye over the state of the climate debate and has concluded that climate alarmists are on the ropes:
 
“The proponents of man-made climate catastrophe asked us for so many leaps of faith that they were bound to run out of credibility in the end.”
https://www.thegwpf.com/clive-james-climate-alarmists-were-bound-to-run-out-of-credibility/

MASS DEATH DIES HARD
https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2017/07/Clive-James.pdf

11
Generelt / Rettssak mot oljeselskap
« på: 19.07.2017, 23:50:40 »
California Counties Use Big Tobacco Lawsuit Tactics to Go After Big Oil
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/19/california-counties-use-big-tobacco-lawsuit-tactics-to-go-after-big-oil/

LOS ANGELES (CN) — In a legal assault similar to the one that won multibillion-dollar awards from Big Tobacco, two Bay Area counties and a coastal city blamed Chevron, ExxonMobil and three dozen other oil, gas and coal companies for climate change and rising sea levels that threaten communities on the California coast.

Statoil, som gjerne vil fremstille seg som grønt, inkludert.
Hvordan skal de kunne forsvare seg når de servilt har vært etterplaprere av klimahysterikerne?
Følgmed, kjøp tonnevis med popkorn, for dette blir skikkelig advokatmat.

12
Modeller eller observasjoner / Mistenkelige justeringer
« på: 10.07.2017, 23:00:41 »
Justeringene til de viktigste landbaserte data over global temperatur viser en tvilsom og mistenkelig trend med stadig brattere temperaturstigning siden Lille Istid og reduksjon av varmeperioden på 1940-tallet før utslipp av CO2 antas å ha hatt noen rolle.

Dersom feil med landbaserte temperaturmålinger hadde vært tilfeldige, så skulle justeringene vært noenlunde likt fordelt slik at trend i endring ikke skulle endre seg, men trenden er ensidig i klimaalarmistisk retning.  Det er mistenkelig og svært sannsynlig uriktige justeringer, noe som bevises i denne rapporten:

On the Validity of NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU Global Average Surface Temperature Data  &  The Validity of EPA’s CO2 Endangerment Finding - Abridged Research Report
 
Dr. James P. Wallace III Dr. Joseph S. D’Aleo Dr. Craig D. Idso
June 2017

https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf

Utdrag fra konklusjon:
The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming.   

13
Generelt / Motiv for klimaengasjement
« på: 24.06.2017, 08:04:42 »
Jeg er fullstendig enig i denne forklaringen på hvorfor vi Klimarealister skal engasjere oss i klimasaken:

Why I Spend So Much Time and Effort on Climate Skepticism
Alan Carlin | June 22, 2017 (BSc physics, Phd economy, formerly EPA employee)
http://www.carlineconomics.com/archives/3697

I am sometimes asked why I spend so much time on climate skepticism. Why not just ignore the climate issue and let the climate alarmists have their way at the expense of everyone else, particularly the less wealthy? The full answer can be found in my book, but the short answer is that there is too much at stake for the US and the world not to do everything possible to avoid the imposition of climate alarmist ideology.
It is now clearer than ever that the alarmists have no intention of reaching a symbolic compromise that while unjustified might be livable by the rest of society. Rather, their apparent intention is to keep pushing the US and other developed countries into a fossil fuel-less society in which all energy used will come from wind and solar or a few other “renewables” but not including either hydro or nuclear. This is just what the Democratic Party included in its Party platform last year. And if their candidate had won, this is exactly what the US would now be trying to do. She even endorsed Al Gore’s objectives just before the election, perhaps in hopes of added votes from “environmentalists.”
If this had happened, this is a recipe for a financial disaster and probably the end of the US as a global innovator and economic leader. The immediate reason is that their goal of a fully fossil fuel-less society cannot be achieved even if all resources available were spent on it. Rather, their goal would result in the enslavement of the US economy to this one never achievable and pointless end. Ever more technical and economic resources would be devoted to this end. And for what purpose? To lessen an alleged threat from catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) and stronger extreme weather phenomena that has never been shown to exist. The best available science shows that increased carbon dioxide has no significant effect on temperatures, and CAGW has not happened.
So climate alarmism is not just the biggest scam ever perpetrated on society, but one that would do immense real damages to all the objectives I have for our country, our economy, and the environment.
Under a Climate Alarmist Regime, Most New Efforts Would Be Devoted to This One Dubious Purpose
In the end, most new efforts would be devoted to this one dubious purpose. All fossil fueled power plants would have to be rebuilt at the expense of users. All motor vehicles would have to be replaced by their owners with electric vehicles. All housing and other buildings would have to use only electricity for fuel and be ever more air-tight and unhealthful. The population would be no better off and increasingly poorer. Government would become ever more powerful and the citizens ever worse off. In order to avoid using fossil fuels, the all encompassing electric grid would fail with increasingly regularity and more serious consequences. Electricity would become ever more expensive and unreliable.
Some may think I am exaggerating, but one only needs to look at what has happened in Great Britain, Germany, Ontario, and South Australia to see what would happen here. And it will happen unless people learn how much is at stake and take a strong stand against this special interest that wants to ruin the energy-using modern world as we now know it for no real purpose at all.

14
Aktører og hendelser / Faktisk om klima
« på: 23.03.2017, 22:07:36 »
Prof. Humlum har gitt ut en rapport om klima basert på observasjoner:

THE WORLD’S FIRST STATE OF THE CLIMATE SURVEY BASED ON OBSERVATIONS ONLY
http://www.thegwpf.org/the-worlds-first-state-of-the-climate-survey-based-on-observations-only/

Among the key findings of the survey are:

While 2016 was one of the warmest years on record, global temperatures dropped back at the end of the year to levels prior to the strong 2015/16 El Niño. This fact suggests that much of the global 2015–16 temperature peak was caused by a one of the strongest El Niños on record.

Since 2003, the global temperature estimate based on surface station measurements has consistently drifted away from the satellite-based estimate in a warm direction, and is now about 0.1◦C higher.

Much of the heat given off during the 2015–16 El Niño appears to have been transported to the polar regions, especially to the Arctic, causing severe weather phenomena and unseasonably high air temperatures.

Data from tide gauges all over the world suggest an average global sea-level rise of 1–1.5 mm/year, while the satellite-derived record suggests a rise of more than 3 mm/yr. This noticeable difference between the two data sets still has no broadly accepted explanation.

Arctic and Antarctic sea-ice extents since 1979 have developed in opposite directions, decreasing and increasing, respectively. In the Arctic, a 5.3-year periodic variation is important, while for the Antarctic a cycle of about 4.5 years duration is important. Both these variations reached their minima simultaneously in 2016, which explains the recent minimum in global sea-ice extent.

Prof Humlum said: “There is little doubt that we are living in a warm period. However, there is also little doubt that current climate change is not abnormal and not outside the range of natural variations that might be expected.”

15
Biolog og naturverner, med en imponerende merittliste; Morten Jødal har gitt ut en ny bok:

Miljømytene - står vi ovenfor verdens undergang


Boken anbefales (har begynt å lese) og kan kjøpes her:
http://klimarealistene.com/klimabutikken.html

Boken knuser en rekke myter fra algeoppblomstring, skogdød, tareskog, mmm + selvfølgelig klimahysteriet.

Sider: [1] 2