Climate Science's Myth-Buster (https://www.city-journal.org/global-warming)
Betent utdrag:
QuoteIn 2005, I had a conversation with Rajendra Pachauri, an Indian railway engineer, who remade himself into a climatologist and became director of the IPCC, which received the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize under his tenure. Pachauri told me, without embarrassment, that, at the UN, he recruited only climatologists convinced of the carbon-dioxide warming explanation, excluding all others.
Quote from: Administrator on 06.03.2019, 12:37:51
Climate Science's Myth-Buster (https://www.city-journal.org/global-warming)
Betent utdrag:
QuoteIn 2005, I had a conversation with Rajendra Pachauri, an Indian railway engineer, who remade himself into a climatologist and became director of the IPCC, which received the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize under his tenure. Pachauri told me, without embarrassment, that, at the UN, he recruited only climatologists convinced of the carbon-dioxide warming explanation, excluding all others.
Sitatet er fra forfatteren Guy Sorman, som møtte Pachauri. Et "betent" sitat fra Curry er dette:
"Climatology has become a political party with totalitarian tendencies," she charges. "If you don't support the UN consensus on human-caused global warming, if you express the slightest skepticism, you are a 'climate-change denier,' a stooge of Donald Trump, a quasi-fascist who must be banned from the scientific community."
Quote from: ConTrari1 on 11.03.2019, 09:45:50
Quote from: Administrator on 06.03.2019, 12:37:51
Climate Science's Myth-Buster (https://www.city-journal.org/global-warming)
Betent utdrag:
QuoteIn 2005, I had a conversation with Rajendra Pachauri, an Indian railway engineer, who remade himself into a climatologist and became director of the IPCC, which received the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize under his tenure. Pachauri told me, without embarrassment, that, at the UN, he recruited only climatologists convinced of the carbon-dioxide warming explanation, excluding all others.
Sitatet er fra forfatteren Guy Sorman, som møtte Pachauri. Et "betent" sitat fra Curry er dette:
"Climatology has become a political party with totalitarian tendencies," she charges. "If you don't support the UN consensus on human-caused global warming, if you express the slightest skepticism, you are a 'climate-change denier,' a stooge of Donald Trump, a quasi-fascist who must be banned from the scientific community."
Ja, klimamakta har gjort fri og uavhengig forskning rundt temaet umulig: Hvis man ikke sverger klar og tydelig troskap til korpset stenges man automatisk ute fra neste bevilgningsrunde.
Samtidig bygges det selvsagt opp en veldig fallhøyde: Skulle klimaet etter hvert begynne å oppføre seg enda tydeligere i brudd med klimaindustrimodellene vil sensasjonsmedia - som hittil har levd fett på AGW-alarmisme - kunne snu brutalt og satse på en ny alarmisme som gir enda flere oppslag:
"Klimaforskernes modeller feiler enda mer - politikerne krever en forklaring på hvordan de har blitt ledet til grov feilsatsing"Det kan bli et mer stimulerende blodbad enn å bivåne dagens klimakjeltringer i media, forskning og politikk skremme enker og faderløse med helt useriøse vrengebilder av virkeligheten.
Man kan håpe, men jeg tror det er mer realistisk at i et slikt tilfelle vil politikerne sitte musestille. Det er for mange koblinger mellom forskning og politikk. Dersom det kom virkelig alvorlige beskyldninger mot klimaforskerne fra politisk hold, kanskje til og med krav om straff, ville man nok kunne grave frem dokumentasjon på politiske
føringer...bedre å sitte stille i båten.